Display to header level
A landowner who is concerned about the future use of his land can donate or sell the land on a conditional rather than absolute basis. A reversionary interest is created by a deed that reserves to the grantor a future ownership right upon the occurrence of some condition.
A reversionary interest is created when a deed provides that the property transfer is “on condition that” or “only for so long as” the property described in the deed is used, or not used, for certain purposes. The reservation of a reversionary interest in a deed gives the original owner (and the owner’s heirs, successors and assigns) a powerful tool to take the land back if promises about future land use are broken.
A reversionary interest is useful for addressing a number of conservation scenarios:
The possibility of future ownership – the reversionary interest – can be transferred to a land trust or other person or entity by recordation of a deed or other instrument of transfer in the public records of the county in which the land is located.
Because a reversionary right may not be exercised for an indeterminate period, an individual who has reserved such a right is well advised to transfer the right during his lifetime to an entity that can act quickly and decisively in the event of a breach of condition.
Reversionary interests can be structured in several ways. The change of ownership can occur automatically when the condition is broken or it can occur only if and when the holder of the reversionary interest elects to retake the property once the condition is broken. The reserved right can be structured as an option to repurchase for nominal, fair value or other consideration if and when the condition is broken.
An automatic reversion is created by a deed that grants title from grantor to grantee on condition that, or only for so long as, certain conditions are met. If nothing more is said about how the change of ownership is to occur, it happens automatically upon the occurrence of the condition. Full title and the right of possession become immediately vested in the original grantor or whoever now holds the grantor's possibility of reverter.
While this is true as a legal principle, in actuality it's not that simple: official title and tax records are not automatically changed merely by delivery of an affidavit that a certain occurrence has happened and, accordingly, by operation of law, the holder of the reversionary interest is now the owner of the property. An action in ejectment (an action to determine rights of possession) or, perhaps, if possession of the property is not in issue, an action in quiet title (an action to determine rights of ownership), may be necessary to establish the termination of the grantee's fee simple interest and the change of ownership to the holder of the reversionary interest on the public records. If the occurrence of the triggering event is disputed, then establishing the change of ownership may not be simple, easy or inexpensive.
It is generally unwise to accept ownership of a parcel of land that has not been inspected for conformance to applicable laws. The land may have been free of hazardous substances or waste when conveyed but there is no guarantee that it will be free of problems when the condition is broken. For that reason, a right of reentry may be preferable to an automatic reversion. The right of reentry is created by adding to the reversionary clause described above a provision along the lines of the following:
but if the land ceases to be used as and for a public park or nature preserve, then grantor, his heirs and assigns, have the right to re-enter the premises and, upon exercise of such re-entry, all right, title and interest of grantee in the above-described premises shall cease and revert immediately to grantor, his heirs and assigns.
Contemporary drafting practices would support adding to the provision an agreed upon method to effectuate the re-entry, other than by taking actual possession or by commencement of an action in ejectment, such as giving of notice by certified mail, etc. to the address of the then owner identified on the county tax records and/or posting at the property.
No compensation is paid upon the occurrence of an automatic reversion or a right of re-entry. This may be perfectly acceptable if the original transfer was a donation strictly for open space purposes. But if the original transfer was a sale, in whole or in part, or the grantee is expected to install improvements consistent with applicable restrictions, then the grantee may not be willing to accept the creation of a reversionary interest that does not provide for some compensation being paid to the grantee upon the reversion or exercise of right of re-entry. One method to address this need for compensation is to substitute for a right of re-entry an option to purchase. The purchase price could be the original consideration adjusted by some factor, compensation for the present value of improvements, fair market value or some other calculation that takes into account the reasonable expectations of the parties without rewarding the grantee for breach of the condition triggering the reversionary right.
Consideration should be given to drafting the triggering event so that action can be taken before damage or destruction of conservation values has occurred.
Change of ownership alone as a triggering event may be challenged as an unreasonable restraint on alienation unless the restriction is limited to a particular category of owners that bears some reasonable relationship to the purpose of the condition. For example, if the purpose of the reversionary right is to limit the universe of potential owners to entities who would have qualified as an original grant fund recipient, then the triggering event could be drafted so as to be a change of ownership to a person or entity who would not so qualify.
If change of ownership is the triggering event, a right of first purchase may be considered as an additional or alternative right to reacquire the property.
To avoid an issue as to whether a third party can be vested with the reversionary interest reserved in a deed, it is advisable not to name the third party in the deed; instead, transfer the reversionary right reserved to the grantor (and their heirs, successors and assigns) to the third party by separately recorded assignment.
The possibility of reversion impacts marketability of title to a greater degree than the existence of a deed restriction on future use of the property (sometimes called a restrictive covenant). If a restrictive covenant is violated, perhaps inadvertently, the owner can cease the non-compliant activity without concern that his title may be vulnerable to divestment. If the violation has triggered a reversion, title may have been divested or may be subject to divestment even though nothing appears on the public record and the triggering activity has ceased without any visible signs on the property. Title risks are a factor taken into consideration in establishing market value of a property.
Determining who has the right to exercise, modify or release a reversionary right can be a complicated title problem. Possibilities of future ownership are often not specifically addressed in wills and so pass through residuary clauses or intestate succession over a number of generations resulting in a large number of individuals holding an undivided proportionate share in the reversionary right.
An action in ejectment or quiet title may be necessary to effectuate the reversionary right and establish good and marketable title on the public record.
Remedies for breach of a restrictive covenant, such as injunctive relief, may not be available if the occurrence is stated only as a triggering event for the reversionary right and not as a separately enforceable restrictive covenant.
Property law varies by state. While Pennsylvania law is the context for this exploration of reversionary interests, much of the guide's content has relevance nationwide.
Patricia L. Pregmon, attorney at law, is the primary author, and Andy Loza, the contributing author and editor.
The Pennsylvania Land Trust Association prepared this guide with support from the Growing Greener Program of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation as well as the William Penn Foundation.
Nothing contained in this or any other document available at ConservationTools.org is intended to be relied upon as legal advice. The authors disclaim any attorney-client relationship with anyone to whom this document is furnished.
Copyright © is held by the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association
Text may be excerpted and reproduced with acknowledgement of ConservationTools.org and the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association.