Conservation Reserve Program Forest Land Opportunities 4 September 1995 Considering Leasing Contracts for CRP Trees Coleman W. Dangerfield Jr., Economist David H. Newman, Forest Economist David J. Moorhead, Forester D.B. Warnell School of Forest Resources Extension Forest Resources The University of Georgia Larry W. Thompson, Associate Chief, Forest Management Georgia Forestry Commission Introduction ! Control ingress and egress. At expiration of the CRP contract the forest Lessee may: landowner may be interested in long term management of his/her timber resources by leasing ! Pay lump sum or annual lease payment to their timber land. An individual or company that landowner. specializes in timber leases can ensure adequate ! Assume fire protection responsibility. growth, protection, and productivity through ! Develop prescribed fire program. knowledgeable management skills. However, a ! Assume general tree management. word of caution is due. BE SURE THAT YO U ! Use best management practices (BMP's), KNOW WHAT YOU ARE GETTING INT O including roads and streams. BEFORE SIGNING ANY TIMBER LEASE. ! Assume risk of loss from: flood, wildfire, insects, disease, storms, etc. There are usually two types of leases ! Pay ad valorem tax on trees at harvest. available to the owner: (1) single, up front lump sum ! Pay all marketing and harvesting related payment, and (2) annual increment payment. The costs. owner should determine, in consultation with his ! Maintain legal boundaries at lease end. lawyer and forester, which type lease is most ! Clearcut stand at end of lease. beneficial to his individual needs. Stipulations and ! Regenerate trees after clearcut. responsibilities within the lease should be examined ! Control ingress and egress. carefuly to be sure that they are clear and understandable. The following information can help Reasons for landowners to lease timber stands : you examine common assumptions to consider for these: ! Earn annual income from tree crops. ! Lease rate based on your trees: stand Some timber lease assumptions conditions, tree species, market area, site index, etc. ! Benefit from high level of management Landowner may : knowledge of lessee. ! Transfer risks of tree production loss and ! Retain land ownership. marketing to lessee. ! Pay annual land ad valorem taxes. ! Retain hunting lease rights. Reasons for landowner not to lease timber : ! Retain pine straw lease rights. Landowners can earn their greatest monetary ! Leasing company reputation is questionable. returns by growing their own trees from planting to ! Wants to ensure greatest freedom and financial maturity. But, more landowner inputs are flexibility. required to grow their own trees. Generally, fewer ! Has adequate timber management ability. dollars are earned by landowners leasing their trees. ! Seeks to earn all returns from trees Also, realize that less landowner inputs are required (management, risk, labor, capital, etc.). when leasing. However, with leasing, cash-flow is ! A binding, legal contract is difficult to break greatly improved for the landowner. Leasing if unforseen circumstances develop. remains an important option and can be a win/win experience for landowners and lessees. When Landowner options without timber lease : examining any lease option, landowners should consider the following: ! Provide own timber management/marketing expertise. ! Leasing trees is a new option -- Go Slowly. ! Hire high quality timber ! Check-out leasing company. management/marketing expertise through ! Consider leasing only part of timberland. professional forestry consultant. ! Consult a lawyer before signing any lease ! Assumes all risks of profit or loss from agreement. growing trees. ! Lease only the specific resource (growing ! Freedom of unencumbered land ownership. trees), not full use of the land. Implications for the CRP landowner Keeping these lands planted in trees will reduce soil erosion losses while increasing the future supply of timber in Georgia. Other benefits of keeping CRP land in trees include improved water quality, enhanced fish and wildlife habitat, reduced stream and road-side sediment, and reduced production of surplus agricultural commodities. In addition, pesticide application on forest land is greatly reduced relative to row-crop land.