French and Pickering v Natale - Conservation Tools

Share

Home » Libraries » ConservationTools Library » French and Pickering v Natale

French and Pickering v Natale

Library Categories

Land Use Ordinances & Development Standards
- Agricultural Preservation
- Comprehensive Plans
- Conservation By Design
  - Case Studies
- Historic Preservation
  - Historic Preservation - General
  - Historic Preservation Ordinances
- Official Map
- Public (Mandatory) Dedication and Fees-in-Lieu Ordinances
- Recreation, Park and Open Space Plans
- Sign Ordinances
- Steep Slopes
- Timber Harvest Ordinances
- Transfer of Development Rights
- Transportation Planning
- Zoning for Solar and Wind Systems
- Other Zoning & Land Development Ordinances

Acquisition of Land & Easements
- Conservation Easements
  - Model Easements & Other Legal Documents
  - Baseline Documentation
  - Conservation Easement Amendment, Modification and Termination
  - Conservation Easement Implementation Guides
- Farmland Preservation
- Trail & Public Access Easements
- Appraisals
- Strategic Conservation Planning
- Survey & GPS
- Negotiation

Financing Conservation
- General Conservation Finance Guides
- Transfer Fees & Stewardship Contributions
- Private Finance
- Public Open Space Programs and Ballot Campaigns
  - Referenda Results
- Funding Programs

Stewardship of the Land
- Invasive Plant Species
  - Ecology
  - Identification and Control
  - Invasive Species in Pennsylvania
- Habitat & Wildlife Management
- Riparian Buffer
- Native Plant Species
- Stewardship of Eased Lands
- Survey & GPS

Case for Conservation
- Economic Benefits of Conservation
  - Economic Benefits of Biodiversity
  - Cost of Community Services
  - Economic Benefits of Ecosystem Services
  - Journals and Toolkits
  - Economic Benefits of Open Space
  - Economic Benefits of Outdoor Recreation And Tourism
  - Economic Benefits of Parks
  - Economic Impacts of Sprawl and Smart Growth
  - Economic Benefits of Trails
  - Economic Benefits of Urban Greenspace
  - Economic Benefits of Waterways and Wetlands
  - Economic Benefits of Working Lands
- Health Benefits of Conservation
- Environmental Benefits of Conservation
- Public Opinion Surveys & Polls
- Referenda Results
- Saving Land Saves Tax Dollars: Costs of Development & Conservation
  - Conducting Cost of Community Service Analyses
  - Costs of Community Services: Case Studies

Introduction to Land Trusts & Their Work

The Law
- Audits
- Eminent Domain & Takings
- Federal Tax Law
- Federal Law (non-tax)
- Liability Associated with Recreational Use
- Pennsylvania Statutes
- Pennsylvania Code
- Pennsylvania Case Law
- Case Law Review by Frone Crawford, Jr.
- Property Taxes

Landowner Resources
- Government Incentives
- Landowner Guides

Non-Regulatory Government Options
- CREP & Riparian Buffers
- General Resources for Government

Natural Gas
- June 2008 Conference Presentations
- Natural Gas Guidance
- Natural Gas Leases
- Natural Gas Websites & Blogs

Organizational Development & Management
- Advocacy & Lobbying
- Collaboration and Mergers
- Communication Samples (brochures, annual reports, etc.)
- Ethics
- Fundraising & Marketing
- Nonprofit Management
- Sample Bylaws
- Land Trust Standards and Practices
- Strategic Plans/Work Plans

Municipal Parks & Recreation

Trails & Greenways

Public Policy
- Working Papers
- State Conservation Tax Credits

Education & Communication
- Outreach Programs
- Curricula

Conference & Workshop Materials
- 2009 Pennsylvania Land Conservation Conference
- 2010 Pennsylvania Land Conservation Conference

Kittatinny Municipal Resources

Land Use Planning
- Technological Tools for Land Use Planning
- Design and Vision
  - Street and Transportation Design
- Land Use and Growth Management
- Build Out Analysis

Print Versions of ConservationTools.org Guides

Miscellaneous

Org./Source: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Year: 2002

Pennsylvania courts and federal courts applying Pennsylvania law have held, in several of the cases arising from the French and Pickering v Natale matter, that the breaching landowner is personally liable for compensatory damages arising from a breach of a restrictive covenant in a conservation easement. There are no other reported cases in which enforcement of a promise to pay in a conservation easement has been sought in any Pennsylvania court of appeals.

Files for Download or Pages for Viewing

French_and_Pickering_v_Natale.pdf (197.0 KB)

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/2...

Item type(s): Court Opinion or Legal Brief
Topic tags: Transfer Fees & Stewardship Contributions

Last modified by Elana Richman

Comments

Viewed 424 times.
Last modified Aug 16, 2011

Suggest changes to this item

Contact Us About Us Donate Terms Privacy

Thanks to Steven J. Schiffman for supporting this website. Thanks also to the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Photos courtesy of Wildlands Conservancy / T.L. Gettings.

This website is for general information only and is not intended to provide legal advice or legal opinion. Those who contribute information to the site assume no responsibility for errors and omissions or any liability for damages resulting from use of the material here. This site is maintained by the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association.

© 2012 Pennsylvania Land Trust Association