Bookmark and Share Share

Back to Prosperity, A Competitive Agenda for Renewing Pennsylvania

Library Categories



Year: 2003

Between 1982 and 1997, Pennsylvania’s population grew by 2.5% while its urbanized footprint grew by 47%. Sprawl causes the state’s cities, towns, and older suburbs to decline as the locus of the state’s growth shifts toward outlying newer communities. Sprawl burdens taxpayers because providing infrastructure is more expensive for sprawling communities and urban decay depresses property values, it undercuts the state’s economic competitiveness and it creates economic isolation for minorities and low-income residents.

Files for Download or Pages for Viewing

Back_to_Prosperity-_A_Competitive_Agenda_for_Renewing_Pennsylvania.pdf (559.0 KB)
Back_to_Prosperity__Full_Study_-_A_Competitive_Agenda_for_Renewing_Pennsylvania.pdf (7.0 MB)

http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2003/12metropolitanpolic...

Item type(s): Report or Research Paper
Topic tags: Economic Impacts of Sprawl and Smart Growth, Public Policy

Last modified by Elana Richman

Comments


Viewed 536 times.
Last modified Nov 28, 2011